| Author |
Message |
| Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,650 |
| | Posted: | | | | Today I cam across a 3 month old post with regards to covers that was very helpful to me but I was unable to thank with a green arrow because the post is older than whatever time limit is used. Would be nice if the time restrictions were removed as helpful posts can be helpful for years.  |
|
| Registered: March 28, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,299 |
| | Posted: | | | | Makes sense to me.
KM | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS!
Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles.
You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | Second this. I wanted to give bigdaddyhorse a green arrow for his Alligator scans, but I was unable to.  I'm sorry Big Daddy. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree to green arrows without a time limit, but I don't think we need the same for red ones. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting kdh1949: Quote:
I agree to green arrows without a time limit, but I don't think we need the same for red ones. Yep, yep. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: September 29, 2008 | | Posts: 384 |
| | Posted: | | | | Very much agree with this. There have been old posts on a number of occasions that have really helped me out and I wish I could have greened them. So very good idea. | | | | "The perfect is the enemy of the good." - Voltaire |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | If memory serves, greens normalize over time. If that's based on the age of the post, a green on a two-year old post will have almost no weight for the stars. If it's based on when the green was given, all good!
I suspect it's the former since my green list seems to be sorted by post date though it's a good bet that greens would be given in the same order as the post date too. |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Good idea, had this problem also sometimes, so I gave you a greeny before it's too late.  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 646 |
| | Posted: | | | | It would mean that those who do not post frequently will have a shot at say, the first star...
I realy don't care about the stars but rather if a post I've made gets 1 greeny it means, too me, that I did good.
However, knowing (with my low post frequency) that I will probably never get a shot at a star, feels a little unjust. So, yea, it would be a little more fun to help out!
On the giving end, I agree with that which is already said. |
|