| Author |
Message |
| Registered: April 13, 2007 |  Posts: 651 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just bought the Norwegian copy of Defiance, and as media company there are listed as follow: Distributed by Paramount Home Entertainment in Norway under licence by Scanbox Entertainment Denmark A/S (A/S equals incorporated) Should both be listed as MC, and if so, wich one first, if just one, what company.  | | | "What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi |
|
  | Corne | | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
| Registered: April 5, 2007 |  Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would say both. The only thing that bothers me is the fact that Denmark stands behind Scanbox Entertainment. There is no rule for the ranking of the media companies. Personally I would enter the license holder first and then followed by the DVD distributor. | | | | Cor |
|
| Registered: April 13, 2007 | | Posts: 651 |
| | Posted: | | | | I never include countries so they will not be included. You mean Scanbox first, then Paramount? | | | "What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi |
|
| Corne | | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
| Registered: April 5, 2007 | | Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bentyman: Quote:
I never include countries so they will not be included. You mean Scanbox first, then Paramount? I know, the country suffix is not allowed by the Rules. But what bothers me is that your profile is of Norwegian locality and the license holder is registered in Denmark. Or is Scanbox a Danish company that releases in whole Scandinavia? But indeed, Scanbox Entertainment first and then Paramount Home Entertainment. | | | | Cor |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quote:
Scanbox was originally founded in Denmark, and as a direct result of domestic and international business agreements, acquired distribution rights for a string of Danish and international video films. Scanbox subsequently also acquired video companies in all four Scandinavian countries, thereby enabling distribution operations for the theatrical, video and TV markets throughout Scandinavia.
Scanbox Entertainment | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | I usually enter them in the order they are listed but, Corne is correct, there is no rule that covers this. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Corne: Quote:
But indeed, Scanbox Entertainment first and then Paramount Home Entertainment. There is no rule for that. I always list the local distributor last as it is the "last link", but that's just my way. So, no indeed at all. |
|
| Corne | | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
| Registered: April 5, 2007 | | Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
Quoting Corne:
Quote:
But indeed, Scanbox Entertainment first and then Paramount Home Entertainment.
There is no rule for that. I always list the local distributor last as it is the "last link", but that's just my way. So, no indeed at all. Bentyman asked me whether I would do it in that order and indeed I would enter the studios in that order. I have never implied that the way I enter the media companies is also a rule! In fact, if you had read my reply before you woudl have known that I have said quite the opposite: Quoting Corne: Quote:
There is no rule for the ranking of the media companies. Personally I would enter the license holder first and then followed by the DVD distributor. | | | | Cor | | | | Last edited: by Corne |
|