|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
Slip Cover Scans |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 32 |
| Posted: | | | | Here's a PARTIAL list of some of the DVDs that I have slip-covers on the keep cases where they are different from the existing images (most images are of the keep case rather than the slip-cover)...and thus pursuant to the rules, the slip-cover should be the one scanned and in the database (Although the rules also always warrant the best version, hopefully some of you can get some good scans from the slip covers that are better than the keep case ones) And yes almost all of these originally came with a slip-cover and were bought at Best Buy on day of release...so anyone with a scanner, your help is appreciated in getting these corrected in the database. :
043396102064 - xXx: State of The Union: Widescreen Special Edition 786936248951 - The Wild 012236189428 - Waiting...: Unrated and Raw: 2 Disc Deluxe Edition 025192326622 - Van Helsing: Widescreen 097360289947 - Tommy Boy: Holy Schnike Edition 043396172340 - Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby: Widescreen Unrated and Uncut 024543267515 - Taps: 25th Anniversary Special Edition 786936213645 - Sleeping Beauty: Special Edition 786936720983 - Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest: 2 Disc Special Edition 786936157147 - Pocahontas: 10th Anniversary Edition 024543372325 - Point Break: Pure Adrenaline Edition 085392891924 - Heat: Two Disc Special Edition 786936215595 - Finding Nemo: 2 Disc Collector's Edition 794043756528 - Elf: Infinifilm 085393190828 - Chariots of Fire: Two Disc Special Edition 786936239058 - Chicago: The Razzle-Dazzle Edition 025192632426 - The Chronicles of Riddick: Unrated Director's Cut 025192472220 - The Chronicles of Riddick: Pitch Black: Unrated Director's Cut 097360504545 - Clueless: "Whatever!" Edition 012236132509 - The Crying Game: Collector's Edition 025192581922 - Dawn Of The Dead: Unrated Director's Cut 031398172314 - Beyond The Sea 025192031229 - Doom: Unrated Extended Edition 025192545726 - The Bourne Identity: Extended Edition 031398110859 - Cabin Fever 025192002328 - Apollo 13: 2 Disc Anniversary Edition 097360309041 - Airplane!: "Don't Call Me Shirley!" Edition 031398206927 - Crank: Widescreen 031398187868 - Crash: 2-Disc Director's Cut Edition 025192852725 - Carlito's Way: Ultimate Edition 025192734120 - Carlito's Way: Rise To Power: Widescreen 025192014024 - Field Of Dreams: Two Disc Anniversary Edition 043396074385 - The Fifth Element: Ultimate Edition 025193064929 - The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift 085393963026 - Gothika: Two Disc Special Edition 027616905710 - The Great Escape: Special Edition 024543146735 - Garfield: The Movie 025192870224 - George A. Romero's Land Of The Dead: Unrated Director's Cut: Widescreen 012569764538 - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Two Disc Special Edition 085392246724 - Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone: Two Disc Special Edition 043396112353 - Hitch: Widescreen 786936244250 - The Incredibles: 2-Disc Collector's Edition 025192884726 - Inside Man: Widescreen 097361183442 - Jackass: The Movie: Unrated Special Collector's Edition 025192994524 - King Kong: 2-Disc Special Edition 786936284058 - Lady And The Tramp: Platinum Edition 786936222180 - The Lion King 1 1/2 786936157154 - Mulan: Special Edition: 2-Disc Set 786936228519 - Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas 085393353124 - Malcolm X: Two-Disc Special Edition 017153144543 - The Running Man: Special Edition 024543193913 - Robots: Widescreen 017153130072 - Rio Grande: Collector's Edition DVD 678149443325 - The Ring Two: Unrated Edition 025192594427 - Ray: Widescreen 027616884169 - Rain Man: Special Ediition 097360421644 - Pretty In Pink: Everything's Duckie Edition
plus about 100 more I will get to later....but this should give you scanner geniuses a good start.... |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how good your scanner is when the slipcover has polished reflective surfaces. Invariably those areas look like crap. |
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Also, slip covers often have holes in the back (and no UPC), or stickers on the front. Stickers on the keep case image usually are on the plastic and don't hinder when you take the cover out of the sleeve. So there are multiple reasons that keep case images are used. | | | Hans |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 663 |
| Posted: | | | | Here we go again. About a year ago we had the same discussion and here is what Gerri said: Quote: This is the rule:
"If a DVD is packaged in a keep case, within a slipcase of some kind, scan the Cover Images from the outer slipcase. If, however, the Slipcase is reflective, and the inner cover art is identical, use the Keep Case art to scan, as it will give a better quality image. "
As a screener, I can tell you that if someone scans a reflective cover and it looks significantly worse than what it should and the voters voice that opinion (not saying that their opinion is the overriding factor, just that it factors into the decision), then chances are I would not approve it over a good quality scan of the keep case art. And the alternative is also true. If someone scans a reflective cover and it looks reasonably good and there are alot of positive comments for it, then chances are I would approve it.
As for the argument for what makes it identical, in my mind, a cutout for the UPC alone would not make them not identical nor would it being cropped differently. There is a bit of gray here, and this is another situation where I would look to the voters. This is also a case to be very specific in your reasons for voting no or yes.
In both of your examples: "Rear cover slip case has cutout so is not identical to keepcase .... ...Not identical. His head is cut off near the top of back scan, and not so on the Slip Cover's back..."
I would not consider these to be valid reasons for saying that the keep case and slip case are not identical.
-Gerri You can read the whole topic here. | | | We're on a mission from God.
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't know what's going on but after checking kewlcastud's list I notice that there are a number of titles that I myself scanned and submitted the proper slip cover for and they were approved but now have the keepcase covers in the online database . | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 32 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote: Also, slip covers often have holes in the back (and no UPC), or stickers on the front. Stickers on the keep case image usually are on the plastic and don't hinder when you take the cover out of the sleeve. So there are multiple reasons that keep case images are used. Sorry but almost all of these have UPCs and who cares if they have holes in the back where the UPC is and if they have stickers on the front, pull them off. These covers sometimes have completely different images than the inner keep case. If they're reflective and cant be scanned so be it, but dont overgeneralize. Almost all of these covers listed can be easily scanned and hardly any of them are reflective covers. |
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 32 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting eagle61397: Quote: Here we go again. About a year ago we had the same discussion and here is what Gerri said:
Quote: This is the rule:
"If a DVD is packaged in a keep case, within a slipcase of some kind, scan the Cover Images from the outer slipcase. If, however, the Slipcase is reflective, and the inner cover art is identical, use the Keep Case art to scan, as it will give a better quality image. "
As a screener, I can tell you that if someone scans a reflective cover and it looks significantly worse than what it should and the voters voice that opinion (not saying that their opinion is the overriding factor, just that it factors into the decision), then chances are I would not approve it over a good quality scan of the keep case art. And the alternative is also true. If someone scans a reflective cover and it looks reasonably good and there are alot of positive comments for it, then chances are I would approve it.
As for the argument for what makes it identical, in my mind, a cutout for the UPC alone would not make them not identical nor would it being cropped differently. There is a bit of gray here, and this is another situation where I would look to the voters. This is also a case to be very specific in your reasons for voting no or yes.
In both of your examples: "Rear cover slip case has cutout so is not identical to keepcase .... ...Not identical. His head is cut off near the top of back scan, and not so on the Slip Cover's back..."
I would not consider these to be valid reasons for saying that the keep case and slip case are not identical.
-Gerri You can read the whole topic here. I agree completey, as mentioned previously, almost all of these have substantial differences in the picture (would be more than happy to PM you the differences in each) and I would never presume just having a cutout is enough to warrant a change. Obviously the scan has to be good to be accepted. |
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 32 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote: I don't know what's going on but after checking kewlcastud's list I notice that there are a number of titles that I myself scanned and submitted the proper slip cover for and they were approved but now have the keepcase covers in the online database . Yeah, same thing happened to me. Also I noticed that several correct scans were replaced with incorrect scans just because the scan was better. I don't know about you but I'd rather have an okay version of the correct scan then a great scan of the wrong one. |
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 32 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote: Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how good your scanner is when the slipcover has polished reflective surfaces. Invariably those areas look like crap. Agreed, obviously if they are reflective covers and can't produce good scans, there is nothing we can do...but the majority of these do not have that problem. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|