Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next
PRE-RELEASE profiles
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantaka510
Registered: May 25, 2007
United States Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I don't know if this has been discussed before or not, but it's something that been bugging me for a little while now.

Often times I'll get a DVD that was recently released and it's already in the database.  As I look through the profile it's chalked full of wrong information.  It has cast credits that are wrong and out of order, the overview is almost always wrong, the video format is usually wrong, the cover scans are usually generic low-quality and sometimes have 'copyrighted material' on them...I could go on.  I guess what I'm trying to get at is this...

It seems that DVD Profiler staff and supporters put a lot of emphasis on making sure things are entered correctly and nothing is taken from "third party databases".  So why are pre-release profiles okay?  What purpose do they serve?  If the person who wants to add it to the DB wants the movie, then buy it and add it when it's released then we can be sure the info is correct the first time and save the screeners time. (especially now with the new update and everyone racing to the be one with the most profile contributions accepted by updating moot pieces of the profile and nothing else *rolls eyes*)  It seems to me that pre-release profiles are only done to pad the number of profile contributions accepted in members' own profiles. *rolls eyes again*  If you have no intention of buying the movie then why do you care if it's in the DB or not?  If you do add the pre-release profile and are planning on buying the movie, then why not be the first to correct the information that is not correct and finish filling in the fields with correct information?

I'm looking at a profile right now.  It was submitted on July 6th 2008, the DVD was released September 9th 2008 and I purchased it on September 25th 2008 and when I looked at the profile I had to do through and correct the usual information.  I am now looking at the DVD Collection of the person who added the pre-release profile and the movie is still not in that collection list.  So why did this person add the movie?  Doesn't make sense to me, but I'm willing to listen if there are indeed good reasons for this.  Not that it matters really.  Just in a ranty mood right now.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,491
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Good post,, and welcome aboard..   
Okay some points for you and all of us.. The Data is submitted and 'some' titles that would be laden with incorrect data may be one of several titles , and that 'one title' with the locality and /or UPC may be a title that is not that well recognised in certain areas of the country.
Therefore the data would/could be wrong and it is up to us to see and forward the corrected material and cast/crew worthiness of said title. The profile that is okay-ed is usually done by one or two people and the odds of accidentally letting that bad title thru can be forgiven. A lot of the bad titles may even be grandfathered over from the Old Intervocative site and that data could be several years old, and is hardly looked upon by our own members.
I recently myself submitted Sunset Boulevard that had no no cast , but a full roster of Crew. I then checked the other same title same edition in the data base and found another title of the same that had a full cast list. I submitted the first title with the now fixed cast list, and after 3 days later have only had two votes on it. Therefore the title in question did not have a heavy 'owned list' .

How did the person contribute a title last summer and still has not added it to their own database?  Probably as I do at times, is download four titles of the same in data base. make all the 'what I believe' is the right additions and then 'cast' all four out for bites. .. If one of the of the four gets heavy attention., and two maybe mediocre attention, and one may get no attention at all.

If I get any no votes, and they are legitimate 'no' votes, I'll pull that title and make corrections. If no votes and it just sits there empty after five days.. It may get approved.,, The others may get rejected or passed as well. Whatever the outcome, after the voting is complete , I'll dump the three versions I don't own, and keep the one I do own, with the approved votes and update that title with a refresh at the end of the week.

That's my story and I'm keeping with it .. 
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
 Last edited: by widescreenforever
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorPantheon
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,819
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I actually agree with you aka510. It's something I have mentioned in the past.

However, the ability to add pre-release films to your wish list is a prominent feature of Profiler - and those profiles have to come from somewhere.

In most cases people are meant to still gather information such as release date/EAN/SRP etc from reliable etailers.
While cast/crew etc are meant to be left blank - as these cannot be verified visually. (Although I know there is an argument for copying cast from old VHS tapes for films that are finally getting a DVD release).

What actually happens, in my opinion, is people see pre-release profiles as an opportunity to put personal preference data into the online database...with no actual thought about the consequences to the database or to such tools as the Credit Lookup.

What I can tell you is that no matter how frustrating it is for you this is a feature that will NOT be going away.

The best thing to do is simply to take these pre-release profiles at face value and use them for the purpose they are meant: ie, to go in your Wish List.

Hope that helps explain the logic a little.
 Last edited: by Pantheon
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsnarbo
Registered: March 13, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 1,242
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with Neil here, I too think that Pre-Release data should be severly limited to Title, SRP, (expected) Release Date, (perhaps but not always) Promotional Covers. Anything else should be rejected straight away how are you going to know Audio, Subtitles, Video, Cast, Crew without the actual DVD.

But like Neil I also use the Pre-Release option in DVDP, it helps me and my family now which DVD's I would like in my collection, what with Christmas coming up as well  

Steve
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Steve:

If you have ever seen any of my pre-release Profiles they are indeed very limted. But to eliminate Actors and crew seems excessive. Roles I would agree with. But for example The Dark Knight, I can tell you without seeing the credits, that Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Maggie Gyllenhal, Gary Oldman, Aaron Eckhart, Michael caine and Morgan Freeman had prominent roles in the film. They may have to be re-ordered and of course role data will need to be filled in once we have the disc in hand, but basic cast data info is not terribly difficult.

Pre-release data is VERY important BTW. Even though from time to time the release dates turns into a moving target.

Don't ask me who is in the new Star trek beyond Leonard Nimoy.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorPantheon
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,819
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
But to eliminate Actors and crew seems excessive.


While I see your point, Skip, I don't think it is.
What actual use is the Cast or Crew to a pre-release? Surely, if you're going to go to the trouble of buying (or think of buying) a title you probably already know the major stars involved. All adding partial cast in this way does is propogate the online db with incorrect information.

Quote:
Pre-release data is VERY important BTW.


Absolutely agree!

Quote:
Don't ask me who is in the new Star trek beyond Leonard Nimoy.

Anton Yelchin as Chekov
Zachary Quinto as Spock
Karl Urban as Bones
Simon Pegg as Scotty

....are the only ones I know off the top of my head.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsnarbo
Registered: March 13, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 1,242
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
Steve:

If you have ever seen any of my pre-release Profiles they are indeed very limted. But to eliminate Actors and crew seems excessive. Roles I would agree with. But for example The Dark Knight, I can tell you without seeing the credits, that Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Maggie Gyllenhal, Gary Oldman, Aaron Eckhart, Michael caine and Morgan Freeman had prominent roles in the film. They may have to be re-ordered and of course role data will need to be filled in once we have the disc in hand, but basic cast data info is not terribly difficult.

Pre-release data is VERY important BTW. Even though from time to time the release dates turns into a moving target.

Don't ask me who is in the new Star trek beyond Leonard Nimoy.

Skip


Makes NO difference Skip, as I believe I told you once before, the original release of "The Living Daylights" had to be withdrawn from sale just a couple of days after being released because one of either the cast or crew objected to being included in the DVD version. In the end the title was released but with edited credits as an agreement could not be reached over it.

So as required under the Rules, cast & crew should only come from the DVD credits, else you might as well just use IMDb, they seem to list everybody and his dog for credits. If you want this to be the most accurate DB for DVD's available then as you keep telling people Credits from the Credits Period, you can't have it both ways.

As I said earlier YES I use the Pre-Release feature of DVDP I have even submitted data for some of these myself, but I just supply Release Date (which as you say can move), SRP (if know), Film Produced date (again if know) and if available Pre-Release cover artwork. I have already in my wish list some films that haven't even be seen in the UK cinema's yet, some TV shows tat haven't (that I am aware) been seen even in the US yet (BSG season 5) but once UPC/EAN 's are known and any other details (release date etc) I will be able to hopefully submit.

Steve
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Pantheon:
Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
But to eliminate Actors and crew seems excessive.


While I see your point, Skip, I don't think it is.
What actual use is the Cast or Crew to a pre-release? Surely, if you're going to go to the trouble of buying (or think of buying) a title you probably already know the major stars involved. All adding partial cast in this way does is propogate the online db with incorrect information.

Quote:
Pre-release data is VERY important BTW.


Absolutely agree!

Quote:
Don't ask me who is in the new Star trek beyond Leonard Nimoy.

Anton Yelchin as Chekov
Zachary Quinto as Spock
Karl Urban as Bones
Simon Pegg as Scotty

....are the only ones I know off the top of my head.


Most of the time, pre-release contributions with cast and crew don't get past the screeners.
Hans
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,195
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I for one am glad if the profiles are in the database since it helps me plan my purchases and track interesting releases. If you find that the info is wrong, why don't you correct it yourself instead of complaining? 
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorPantheon
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,819
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Patsa:
Quote:
I for one am glad if the profiles are in the database since it helps me plan my purchases and track interesting releases. If you find that the info is wrong, why don't you correct it yourself instead of complaining? 


That was his point....he is having to correct them when he buys them (as do I).

The issue here is to keep the pre-release information basic and as confirmable as possible.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorJimmy S
Registered: March 15, 2007
Canada Posts: 1,982
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'm not a big fan of those pre-release profile. I don't use DVDP to check what dvd will be release (many website are there for that). If someone really want to attach his/her name to a contribution (I don't see any other reasons for this) good for him/her, but at least keep the info minimal.

By the way DVDP is for cataloguing your dvd not to see your screen name everywhere. I've the same oppinion on the users who place thousands of title on their wishlist when they know that they will never buy them. This is just a way to vote on them and dictate their preference, I've much more problem with this problem and I don't see any good reasons to autorize the voting on the wishlist title (you can't check the dvd, why your vote would be right).
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantaka510
Registered: May 25, 2007
United States Posts: 16
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Pantheon:
Quote:
Quoting Patsa:
Quote:
I for one am glad if the profiles are in the database since it helps me plan my purchases and track interesting releases. If you find that the info is wrong, why don't you correct it yourself instead of complaining? 


That was his point....he is having to correct them when he buys them (as do I).

The issue here is to keep the pre-release information basic and as confirmable as possible.


Quite right.

I see that others feel the pre-release is essential to the database, but it seems that we almost all agree that it should be limited information.

One thing I've noticed as I look through profiles of DVDs I have is that there's a lot of wrong information and the only contributor was someone doing a pre-release profile and never corrected it when the DVD was released.  And those of us who bought it later on didn't bother to look to see if it's correct or not or just didn't care.  I admit back when I first started using the program I didn't add or correct anything for a long time, mostly because I didn't have a scanner and didn't want to take the time to add an entire profile.  But now I feel differently as I like to contribute instead of just use and I do the best I can to make sure all information I add is correct.  Further more, since DVD profiler only benefits those who purchase the DVD, then why are pre-release profiles allowed if that user just deletes them from their collection list after it has been approved and added?  I realize there may be no way of monitoring this.  It's solely up to each user, but I think we should all consider this when adding a pre-release.  If you add it, then you should be the first to buy it and correct and add the information.  If you don't plan on buying it, then why bother adding it?

Maybe I'm being unreasonable, but I think if the rules only allowed basic information as has been suggested then it might not be a problem.  I think cover scans for a pre-release should not be allowed because often times they remain with the profile and never get replaced.  Again, it shouldn't matter to anyone except those of us who actually buy the movie, if we're happy with no cover scans then so be it, shouldn't matter to anyone else.  I also don't see the point, if you were going to add cover scans, that the front cover be used as the back cover.  What point does this serve?  It doesn't add anything of value that I can see.

</rant>
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorcmaeditor
Registered: April 14, 2007
United States Posts: 433
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have submitted Pre-Release submissions for DVDs that I have later removed from my Wishlist. When I did submit the info, which is usually limited to SRP, Release Date, Promotional Cover Images and Features, I ONLY take the info from the Media Publishers listing for the DVD. Many times I AM interested in buying the release, but sometimes I change my mind before the release hits the shelves.

I did this with the Season 1 release of BURN NOTICE. When I was looking over upcoming releases, I saw this and thought I would want to purchase it, When I tried to add it to my wishlist, it wasn't in the Database, so I submitted it. A couple of weeks later, I was looking at my wishlist to see what I had pegged as things I wanted to buy, and changed my mind on the BURN NOTICE set.

There are plenty of DVDs that are added on the release day as well. Many times they are small obscure releases that hadn't been added as a pre-release, but they are also many times store exclusives that have a unique UPC. Hancock had about 3 or 4 different store exclusive versions this week. I ended up submitting the Steelbook edition from Best Buy. Currently there is no Cast and Crew data, but either I or the many other users who purchased that edition will update that info.
Chris
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorPantheon
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,819
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting AESP_pres:
Quote:
This is just a way to vote on them and dictate their preference, I've much more problem with this problem and I don't see any good reasons to autorize the voting on the wishlist title (you can't check the dvd, why your vote would be right).


I totally agree.

I have quite a few things in my wishlist presently.... but I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER vote on contributions for them (always press neutral) because I CAN'T check the information.

Anyone who votes YES or NO is wrong IMO.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorArdos
Registered: July 31, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,506
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Pantheon:
Quote:
Quoting AESP_pres:
Quote:
This is just a way to vote on them and dictate their preference, I've much more problem with this problem and I don't see any good reasons to autorize the voting on the wishlist title (you can't check the dvd, why your vote would be right).


I totally agree.

I have quite a few things in my wishlist presently.... but I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER vote on contributions for them (always press neutral) because I CAN'T check the information.

Anyone who votes YES or NO is wrong IMO.


I partially agree with this. Some things you can know without owning the title like release date, SRP, etc... Those I do vote on. If they don't provide sources or list invalid sources, I vote. I don't vote on contributions when you can only know by having the title.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
It all depends on what you are talking about in the Contribution, it doesn't take rocket science to see that a user provides no source for his data. I'll put my votes on Wishlist up against any user who thinks they can't vote on wishlist data. Wjile I may occassionally make an error in voting, who doesn't, I will put ANY of my votes up against any other user for ANYTHING. This includes the users who think that they can ignore the Rules and vote Yes on the theoiry that something is better than nothing. We recently has a user Contribute Cover Art for 'Wanted' and I voted No...why...because it was Region1 US Profile and the Contributor was trying to supply Region 1 Canada artwork. It's not rocket science. Fortunately the Contribution was DECLINED, despite several users who voted based on the something is better than nothing theory.

There is no provision in the Rules that allow for these kind of votes. We have Rules and they apply to voting as well as Contributing. IU can't even tell you the amount of garbage data that we have in the system because people won't pay attention to what they are doing.

@Neill (50-50 chance of remembering right)   and AESP

Be careful when trying to assign motives to wishlists, while i periodically remove titles, my wishlist is for titles I intend to buy. Admittedly when a title gets out of the initial release phase, if I haven't picked it up, it becomes difficult to get off the wishlist, but it does happen quite frequently. In fact, I am lookinh forward to Q1 2009, which so far looks pretty light, probably due to economy issues, but I may have the opportunity to get a number of titles off my wishlist.<fingers crossed>.

Like I said , though we all need to pay closer attention to what we are doing, what are you teaching a new user if you don't hold his feet to the fire. You are teaching him that the Rules don't really have any meaning. So, before any of you start worrying about issues like this, clean up your own hose FIRST.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next