Author |
Message |
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 426 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 7:19 PM | | | | Quick question regarding multi-disk Digipaks that sit in a slipcase/cover. With 3.1 the parent now must have the Slipcover flag. However, what about the children (which also have Digipak casetype). I would guess that they don't get the flag because the cover belongs to the complete box, not the individual movie/profile. Is this correct ? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 7:20 PM | | | | I would say not as well, repter.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 17,343 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 7:24 PM | | | | I agree... no slipcover for the child profiles. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 3,438 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 7:25 PM | | | | It is correct. | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 7:29 PM | | | | I agree - ticking the box would suggest that each disc had their own slip cover as well as the one over the digipak. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 8:18 PM | | | | not |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 8:39 PM | | | | I just seen an update with it set, and I didn't think so. Glad to see so many in agreement, for once. | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: September 8, 2007 9:01 PM | | | | I'll add it to the slip case thread. |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 426 |
| Posted: September 9, 2007 10:09 AM | | | | Thanks guys! |
|