|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
Zack and Miri |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: That's nice... I'd love to able to interpret the rule that way, but unfortunately I have more than just my interpretation. Because I felt so strongly about this, I had a PM discussion about this with Ken, where I supplied similar examples like the 'Zack and Miri' one here, complete with coverscans and screenshots. And Ken explicitly told me that if the title in the copyright notice matched the one on the cover, that no original title should be entered. I've been keeping them local since. Now, see, that was your first mistake. I find it easier to do what I want if I don't ask for clarification first. I'll try to remember that! |
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting White Pongo, Jr.:
Quote: Well, yes, but sometimes not even the screen credits get it right. I own some DVDs whose foreign original title has been translated in the credits, and the only way to find out the original title would be some sort of external documentation. I get that. I just never encountered something like that - as I said earlier: maybe I just have the wrong movies. Even if I did, I might just be perfectly content with profiling the title from the cover and the title from the credits. If there really was a third variant that I felt was important enough to store somewhere, I think I'd be happy to use the notes field. At least "take the title from the cover and the original title from the film's credits" has quite a lot less of the unfortunate (and needless) side effects that the current rule has - note that what we have now doesn't exactly deal very well with your example either. For instance, I have an R1 copy of Dario Argento's "Il gatto a nove code" which shows on screen "THE CAT O'NINE TAILS", and nowhere on screen or on the cover can the original title be found. Yes, of course I could use the notes to store the original title, but frankly I think that we should use the Original Title field for, guess what?, the Original Title! That's what the rules already say: Foreign Films: The Original Title field will contain the original title for the main feature in the country of origin. i.e. A German DVD release for a film originally produced in the United States would have the German title in the Title field and the English title in the Original Title Field. What I am saying is that, when the distributor translated the title on screen for international markets, the original title of a foreign movie can usually be documented. Here is the authorized Dario Argento web site and some other sources stating the original title "Il gatto a nove code": http://www.darioargento.it/filmografia/film/gatto9code.html http://www.kinoeye.org/02/11/needham11_no2.php http://www.moviehamlet.com/review/1849/the-cat-o-nine-tails http://www.nndb.com/films/260/000108933/ http://www.bcult.it/movies.asp?id=76 | | | -- Enry |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Good luck with making a simple rule out of that. Mind you: I don't disagree with you, it's just that for simplicity's sake, I'd still prefer " take the title from the cover and the original title from the film's credits" for the online database. The less fields we have that require outside documentation, the better, IMHO. Of course there will be exceptions to every rule - it's just that current rule on original titles actually prohibits the correct original title to be entered in MOST cases, whereas my standard actually works wonders for about 99% of the DVD's out there. I'd rather have a 1% error margin than a 60% one. Edit: this got me negative reputation feedback?! | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Although I fully, fully agree that 'Zack and Miri Make a Porno' needs to be in the original title field (and would do so locally), it's not allowed per the rules. I've got many perfectly valid "original titles" declined thanks to this "copyright notice" part of the rule, and it's really time that it stops. I've asked to change that rule time and time again - maybe this time someone will listen.
The issue is that the rules on "original title" say: "Use the title from the copyright notice if available, otherwise from the film's credits." I have personally asked Ken to make the film credits the primary source, providing several very valid and obvious examples like this one, and he declined, saying that making the copyright notice the primary source was done consciously. So now we're stuck with it: if the copyright notice says 'Zack and Miri', then unfortunately, that's what the online database is stuck with. There really is no way around it - under the current rule, that is.
I suggest we all campaign to finally get this fixed. Does it have to be the copyright notice from the cover, or can you take a copyright notice from the film's credits (if available)? | | | Hans |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting sugarjoe: Quote: How can one movie have 2 original titles? That is not possible.
The original title is 'Zack and Miri make a porno', no matter what the copyright notice says. If this is against the rules then something is wrong with them. I could not agree more here. A film can ONLY HAVE ONE ORIGINAL TITLE. Anfd the title of the Walmart and Target DVDS/Blu-rays only have been changed cuz of their weird and insane policies. It is IMPOSSIBLE that a film has 2 original titles. If you would ask Kevin Smith (the director), what do you think he will tell you what the original title is This is a a situiation out of the ordinary. A false and fake cover was made for those 2 companies, which has NOTHING to do with the original title of the film!!!!!!!!!! The original title IS and WILL ALWAYS BE " ZACK AND MIRI MAKE A PORNO" , no matter what a fake cover at Walmart says! greetings Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com | | | Last edited: by DarklyNoon |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 767 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DarklyNoon: Quote: The original title IS and WILL ALWAYS BE "ZACK AND MIRI MAKE A PORNO" , no matter what a fake cover at Walmart says!
greetings Donnie And this is what Kevin Smith had to say about the watered down Walmart cover: Quote: "Some Wal-Mart-er could buy it and think: 'Oh, Zack and Miri, looks lovely,' and pop it in and there's ... some pretty graphic stuff," said the indie icon, known for such slacker hits as "Clerks," "Chasing Amy," "Dogma" and "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back."
"I mean, at least with the word 'porno' in the title, you can kind of give people a warning about what they're in for." |
| | W0m6at | You're in for it now Tony |
Registered: April 17, 2007 | Posts: 1,091 |
| Posted: | | | | Rules update: February 4, 2009 Original Title rule changed Quote: Original Title The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank. Bold for highlighted section. It would be nice to have announcements of rule changes and/or an RSS feed for the rules history page. | | | Adelaide Movie Buffs (info on special screenings, contests, bargains, etc. relevant to Adelaideans... and contests/bargains for other Aussies too!) | | | Last edited: by W0m6at |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 940 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for the speedy update Ken! | | | Kevin |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| | Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | yay, would have been so stupid to use the wrong title from the cover happy weekend all, Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting W0m6at: Quote: Rules update: February 4, 2009 Original Title rule changed
Quote: Original Title The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank. Bold for highlighted section.
It would be nice to have announcements of rule changes and/or an RSS feed for the rules history page. As long as some users don't use this as an excuse to start cramming all those stupid possessive credits into the original title field instead! |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: As long as some users don't use this as an excuse to start cramming all those stupid possessive credits into the original title field instead! Oh No, here we go again... | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting W0m6at: Quote: Rules update: February 4, 2009 Original Title rule changed
Quote: Original Title The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank. Bold for highlighted section.
It would be nice to have announcements of rule changes and/or an RSS feed for the rules history page. Thank goodness this has FINALLY been corrected! | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: Quoting W0m6at:
Quote: Rules update: February 4, 2009 Original Title rule changed
Quote: Original Title The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank. Bold for highlighted section.
It would be nice to have announcements of rule changes and/or an RSS feed for the rules history page.
As long as some users don't use this as an excuse to start cramming all those stupid possessive credits into the original title field instead! That Rule remains unchanged and still says to check the "Credit Block" on the back cover. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|