I'm sorry but I don't understand that... the end credits are just as much as part of the main feature as any other scene is.

Quoting Kathy:

Quote:
If it is after the credits then it isn't incorporated into the main feature.

But, there really isn't any way to really assess the situation without owning the DVD so I am dropping the topic.

also missed in the rules that it also says it has to be a separate menu option....

rules quote:

Quote:
Deleted Scenes, Alternate Scenes, Alternate endings available through a separate menu option, and not incorporated into the main feature or a documentary.

Quoting randin:

Quote:
Not sure if this is the right place for this, but . . .
Is it possible to have either a tick box in features, or a more detailed area to indicate that a movie has some extra material after or during the credits?
Cheers,
Mark.

Could you supply a UPC for this movie.

The information is too vague for me to decide if or where the data could be applied.

Thank you.

You got called out for good reason. I will say follow the rules. don't half read then pretend you know the answer. Having the upc will not change anything on this one. Just admit you are wrong and apologize for your outrageous remarks. You've been caught.

Quoting Winston Smith:

Quote:
You got called out for good reason. I will say follow the rules. don't half read then pretend you know the answer. Having the upc will not change anything on this one. Just admit you are wrong and apologize for your outrageous remarks. You've been caught.

I never said I knew the answer - I offered an opinion. And, my opinion based on the information posted by the OP is NOT wrong.

When I make a mistake - I own it. I also have apologized any time I have done something I was sorry for.

When have you ever taken responsibility for your own actions? As far as I know - never.

How about if I post all the times you have been caught deliberately lying and in violation of invelos rules?

Take your own advice and "Just admit you are wrong and apologize for your outrageous remarks. You've been caught."

Based on the number of green arrows and supportive pms I've received, there are many members of the community who are as fed up with you as I am.

And, since you think you are the only one allowed to speak their minds without restraint, let me tell you exactly what I think of you.

I feel you are mean, nasty troll who has done nothing to make these forums or this database better. You haven't contributed anything in years and berate those who do.

Your self righteous indignation and inability to accept others having the ability to think for themselves has done nothing but hurt this database.

Ken owns the program - not you. Every single member who has paid for this program has the same right to offer their opinion and it carries the same weight as yours.

No one, and I mean no one, is more important than another. You refuse recognize the value of others and their voice. Instead you belittle, harass and generally do everything in your power to use your words in hurtful ways.

How many more members are you going to drive away? Your treatment of people is abhorrent and violates basic standards of civility.

I, for one, have had enough. I've sent in a support ticket requesting Ken take action and require Skip to follow invelos forum rules:

"I have a problem with Winston Smith aka Skip and his attitude and behavior on these forums.

Some may wish that I would remain silent and ignore him and his posts but, at times, this is not something I am willing to do.

Despite Skip's proclamations to the contrary, I have never stated that he is not allowed to speak or express his opinions on the forums.

What I will not tolerate are lies, threats or disrespect to me or others. These things are unacceptable and should not be allowed to go unanswered.

Skip states speaking out against such things makes me a member of the "thought police." When is a request for civility and respect for others deemed objectionable?

Unlike Skip, who resorts to name calling and verbal harassment, when I do confront him I quote those posts I find objectionable and try to do so in a respectful manner.

I not only find this unrelenting, unrepentant disrespect for others objectionable, it violates the written rules and standards of invelos.

I am requesting that Skip be required to follow the forum rules and if he refuses that Ken take action.

Thank you,

Kathy"

If the community feels differently please feel free to give me a red arrow and send Ken a support ticket requesting that action be taken against me.

I stand by forum posts and accept any actions that Ken, invelos and the community feels is appropriate.

On the other hand, I would hope that the community would delve out red arrows and send Ken a support ticket for any posts that Skip has posted that is deserving of them.

Quoting DoubleDownAgain:

Quote:

...I also don't know what Kathy previously posted as she's edited them all...

I based my responses on the OP. Although not verbatim here's the gist of what I said.

It was my opinion that Outtakes might be an appropriate place to put this type of data. I also posted the rules to explain my rationale.

I then commented, based on Jimmy and Pete's posts, that maybe Deleted Scenes would also be a place for this data.

But, after re-reading the OP again, I decided that the question was too vague for me to decide what should be done.

I did not comment on anything that Skip said until he chose to call me out. The insulting remarks of Skip, and the lies he has said about me, I've addressed in another post.

Quoting Kathy:

Quote:
Quoting DoubleDownAgain:

Quote:

...I also don't know what Kathy previously posted as she's edited them all...

I based my responses on the OP. Although not verbatim here's the gist of what I said.

It was my opinion that Outtakes might be an appropriate place to put this type of data. I also posted the rules to explain my rationale.

I then commented, based on Jimmy and Pete's posts, that maybe Deleted Scenes would also be a place for this data.

But, after re-reading the OP again, I decided that the question was too vague for me to decide what should be done.

I did not comment on anything that Skip said until he chose to call me out. The insulting remarks of Skip, and the lies he has said about me, I've addressed in another post.

I understand why you edited them, but IMO you should have left them.  It does give up off the appearance of guilt, like you posted something inappropriate and were covering your tracks.  I don't believe this to be the case and even if you were 'wrong' I don't think you'd owe anyone an apology unless you were rude or disrespectful, which I don't think I've ever seen you be.

I get it Kathy is allowed by invelos to say anything she wishes to or about another user. But if someone takes offense and fights back, well then...speaks for itself. How many times have you called me out, how many libellous remarks have you thrown out at me. I tried to help but no you didn't want to hear  that, no surprise. I'll not counter with insulting remarks of kind you like to employ. I can only say two words and I don't think they will help. Grow up.