| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 8:36 AM | | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: February 1, 2008 4:09 AM by ? |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 8:48 AM | | | | Is this really necessary? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 17,804 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 8:50 AM | | | | He wrote something about 160 (negative) entries.  If this is true, even if I do not agree on everything he wrote, this looks like unnecessary bashing anyway?! IMHO this disqualifies those kind of voters as well... | | | | Thorsten | | | | Last edited: January 31, 2008 8:55 AM by kahless |
|
| Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,004 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 8:56 AM | | | | If this means we can now have discussiosn without being accused of trying to hijack Profiler for our own purposes, then huzzah. These things rarely stick, though. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 9:21 AM | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
Is this really necessary? yes, he's last posting left me with many questions. I've seen the mentioning of tag teaming in that thread. | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: January 31, 2008 9:23 AM by ? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 9:35 AM | | | | skip is clearly personna non grata by some of you! | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: January 31, 2008 10:35 AM by ? |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 11:30 AM | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote:
He wrote something about 160 (negative) entries.
If this is true, even if I do not agree on everything he wrote, this looks like unnecessary bashing anyway?! IMHO this disqualifies those kind of voters as well... My understanding is that Invelos monitors multiple negative ratings on a single post (correct me if I am wrong) and removes the undeserved ones. | | | | -- Enry |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 11:45 AM | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
skip's last posting Posted: January 30, 2008 7:16 PM
already 2 negative? looks like abuse to me If you call people "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" it is not an abuse if you get negative reputation votes. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 374 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:02 PM | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
skip's last posting Posted: January 30, 2008 7:16 PM
already 2 negative? looks like abuse to me I don't get it. You can see 2 negative votes on that entry ? How does that work ? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:42 PM | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote:
Quoting Giga Wizard:
Quote:
skip's last posting Posted: January 30, 2008 7:16 PM
already 2 negative? looks like abuse to me
If you call people "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" it is not an abuse if you get negative reputation votes. where I am calling people: "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:44 PM | | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | | Last edited: January 31, 2008 12:45 PM by ? |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 630 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:48 PM | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
Quoting RHo:
Quote:
Quoting Giga Wizard:
Quote:
skip's last posting Posted: January 30, 2008 7:16 PM
already 2 negative? looks like abuse to me
If you call people "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" it is not an abuse if you get negative reputation votes.
where I am calling people: "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" Not you personally. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/you - check the second meaning of the word.  | | | Regards
Lars | | | | Last edited: January 31, 2008 12:49 PM by lmoelleb |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Posts: 92 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:48 PM | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote:
Quoting RHo:
Quote:
Quoting Giga Wizard:
Quote:
skip's last posting Posted: January 30, 2008 7:16 PM
already 2 negative? looks like abuse to me
If you call people "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" it is not an abuse if you get negative reputation votes.
where I am calling people: "not intelligent enough", "idiots", and "ungrateful bunch of people" RHo quotes are Skip's... Not yours. His you was the general you not you in person. | | |  |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 630 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 12:52 PM | | | | | | | Regards
Lars |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 1:01 PM | | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 1,339 |
| | Posted: January 31, 2008 1:04 PM | | | | Giga,
While I did not vote negative for your post here, I would tell you the reason for it is because many people most likely feel as if a post with a users name in it, designed to specifically discuss a negative post they made, would be in effect... fueling the fire. | | | | -JoN |
|